How To Clean My Glock 23 Gen 4

I have been surprised at the popularity of the Glock 19 9mm versus that of the Glock 23 .40S&W among civilian shooters.

I do non know anyone that carries the Glock 23 on their own fourth dimension and their ain dime. Practically everyone in my circle of friends and associates owns at least ane Glock 19.

The handguns are identical in size and shape and fit the same holsters. My yardstick, tape mensurate and calipers testify that each is 7.35 inches long, nigh v.0 inches high and one.18 inches thick.

They weigh simply 23.6 ounces unloaded and pump upwards to about 32 ounces loaded. Neither Glock features a manual condom. The firing pin block and safe lever in the trigger are the whole show. True safety is between the ears.

The Glock 23 is a great all-around handgun that represents a good balance of ability and weight.

Glock 19 vs. Glock 23

The real difference is in mag capacity. The Glock 19 9mm features a xv-round magazine while the Glock 23 .xl caliber pistol carries 13 rounds in the mag.

Clearly, either holds plenty cartridges on tap for any foreseeable difficulty.

The Glock 23 features the typical Glock double-action-only trigger. There is merely one trigger action to acquire. In my instance, the action is fast and light enough at six pounds. Trigger reset is rapid.

The Glock 23 is snag-free, fast into action, and but feels good in the hands. The sights are adequate for the task at hand, especially with the nighttime sight option. The Glock is easily field stripped and maintained.

Overall, the Glock 23 is not simply a proficient concealed carry handgun, simply an acceptable service pistol likewise.

fifteen-thou accuracy, Glock 23, from a solid bench rest
Hornady 155-grain XTP	1.8 inches
Winchester 155-grain Silvertip	2.0 inches
Remington 180-grain Golden Saber	two.25 inches

This brings united states to the obvious comparing. The Glock Model 23 is chambered for the .40 Smith & Wesson cartridge. The .40 is a outcome of many studies into problems that take indomitable constabulary side arms for over 100 years.

The Smith & Wesson .38 Special handled well and was mild to fire. The problem was that it did non do the job it was intended to do.

The original 158-grain RNL .38 load was often called a "widowmaker" because it failed the officers conveying it.

The author'southward personal Glock 23 compared to the Glock 19. These are similar handguns, but firing characteristics differ due to greater recoil of the .40 caliber cartridge.

Somewhen, the powerful .357 Magnum cartridge was chambered in a relatively meaty revolver. The Smith & Wesson Model 19, and the later Model 13, were great service revolvers.

Problem was, they were hard to command without extensive training. The magnum cartridge was also hard on the gun. They did not crevice or blow, merely magnum recoil was hard on small parts.

The .forty was shoehorned into the 9mm frame in much the aforementioned style and much the same problems surfaced.

The .40 S&W is more hard to command than the 9mm and weapon wear is regarded as greater, although this differs from brand to brand.

Volition we e'er learn? Nevertheless, a study by the Feds some years ago confirmed what many harness cops already knew. A handgun over 35 ounces becomes a brunt past the end of the mean solar day.

The 9mm size handgun is platonic for carrying and for hand fit. A .45 caliber pistol such as the excellent Glock 21 is a stretch for most hand sizes.

A general consensus was reached—supported by well-documented cases and by research—that the 9mm wasn't enough for police piece of work.

Water test results	Velocity	Penetration	Expansion
Hornady Critical Defense 115-grain FTX	1140 fps	14.0	.56
Cor Bon 115-grain DPX +P	1235 fps	eleven.0	.63
Winchester Ranger 147-grain SXT	940 fps	15.0	.54
Hornady 155-grain XTP	1090 fps	17.v	.72
Cor Bon 135-grain JHP	1290 fps	12.0	.70
Remington 180-grain Golden Saber	980 fps	14.five	.65

We could contend the 9mm from hither to Ragnorak, but the fact remains the 9mm's wound potential isn't up to the .45 ACP—but the .45 is too heavy to carry.

I am certain a .45 can be made equally calorie-free equally a 9mm, but the .900-inch long cartridge example demands a long grip frame. The aforementioned goes for the 10mm.

The .xl had been kicking effectually for a while in the form of the centimeter round—.41 Action Express and others. The .twoscore S&W was a success story.

There were a few cracks in the canvas, still. One Federal agency rushed to adopt the Glock 32 and went dorsum to the 9mm because the officers were non qualifying to the previous loftier standard with the Glock 23.

The 9mm Luger and .40 caliber Smith & Wesson cartridges compared. The .40 kicks and hits harder.

This is understandable. Recoil is greater. The first runs of .forty quotient ammunition did not display a loftier degree of accuracy. Some were loaded peradventure as well hot.

Various loads demonstrate excellent wound potential. I have added a few results garnered from experimentation with h2o from 21st Century Stopping Ability, Paladin Press.

The writer is a military intelligence officer and the results are verifiable and repeatable. Equally you can see the results with the .40 caliber across the spectrum of light and heavy bullets and various velocity gives meliorate wound potential than the 9mm. But this isn't the whole story.

Power Factor

9mm	Power	.twoscore S&W	Power	.45 ACP	Power
115 grains 1140 fps	13	155 grains 1090 fps	17	230 grains 868 fps	xix.9
115 grains 1235 fps	14	135 grains 1290 fps	17	185 grains 920 fps	17
147 grains 940 fps	14	180 grains 980 fps	17.5

Shot placement means a cracking bargain. The Glock 19 9mm is easier to shoot well than the .40 caliber pistol. While recoil energy may be calculated, the easiest way is to calculate power factor.

This is bullet weight times velocity divided by 1,000. Information technology is generally regarded that a power factor of 20 or above is too much for control by most shooters in a personal defense gun.

The writer often carries his Glock 23 in this Blackhawk! within the waistband holster.

9mm defense loads rate xiii to 14, the .40 runs to 17 and over. The 230-grain .45 is at 20; the .45 ACP 185-grain standard load is at about 17. (The PF isn't the whole picture—the full-size Glock 21 .45 is among the easiest-kicking handguns in the Glock line due to size and weight.)

So we have a pistol that hits hard, but kicks harder. Gee, Einstein was correct! Many shooters find themselves choosing the 9mm if they want a lot of shots and the .45 if they want knockdown ability. Nada wrong with that, simply they ignore the .40.

Equally for myself, I like the Glock 23. I take been impressed by the results I have carefully researched and cataloged. For those willing to exercise and accept lower times between shots, greater recoil, and perhaps slightly less accented accuracy, the Model 23 offers excellent real-world ballistics.

The Glock 23 is as accurate to a fast first shot as the Glock 19. For those considering a compact pistol and moving from the .45, the Glock 23 offers the best of both worlds. The Glock 23 isn't for anybody, but which handgun is? It is a well-balanced and reliable handgun, and information technology is all Glock.

Glock 23
Action Blazon	Semi-automatic/Safe Action
Butt Length	4.02 inches
Caliber	.40 S&W
Overall Height	4.99 inches
Overall Length	seven.36 inches
Overall Width	ane.18 inches
Weight Unloaded	21.16 ounces
Sights	Fixed
Capacity	xiii
Magazines	ii
Frame	Polymer

9mm or .xl S&West? Exercise you carry the Glock 23 or Glock nineteen? Share your experiences with the Glock 23, 19 or your preferred Glock in the comment section.

Source: https://blog.cheaperthandirt.com/glock-23-carry-gun/

Posted by: myerslizeatied.blogspot.com

Share this post